ACEM Fellowship
ECMO
Evidence
Neonatal
- V-V ECMO vs. conventional care proven in UK in 1993-1995. NNT = 3
Adults and VV-ECMO
- CESAR showed improved survival at 6mo (63% vs. 47%) in severe acute respiratory failure
- ANZ ECMO influenza showed mortality rate of 21%
- Systemic review of H1N1 found insufficient evidence of benefit
Adults and V-A EMCO
- Little evidence base thus far
- Meta-analysis (Ouweneel et al. ICM 2016) showed improve survival by 33% compared to standard care (IABP) but no improvement compared to LVAD
Adults and E-CPR
- Minimal evidence thus far
- Meta-analysis (Ouweneel et al. ICM. 2016) showed improved survival by ~13% and improved neurologically intact survival (Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2) by about the same with a NNT of 7-9
- ARREST trial
- Phase 2 single-centre open-label randomised control trial
- Inclusion:
- Adult patients (known or presumed) 18 – 75 years old
- Initial rhythm of VF or pulseless VT
- No ROSC after 3 shocks (ROSC after >4 shocks did not result in exclusion)
- Body habitus able to support mechanical CPR
- Estimated transport time < 30 minutes
- Exclusion:
- Valid DNR
- Mechanisms: Drowning, blunt or penetrating trauma, burns, overdose
- Pregnancy
- Terminal Cancer
- Active GI or internal bleeding
- Prisoner or nursing home resident
- Cath Lab unavailable, absolute contraindications to emergent angiography or contrast allergy
- 2 or more of: Lactate >18, PaO2 <50, etCO2 <10
- 15 underwent ECMO (1 withdrew later)
- Outcomes
- 6/14 survived to hospital discharge vs. 1/15 in usual care
- Those that survived had fairly good neurological outcomes (CPC 1 -2)
- At what cost?
Indications
Acute, severe reversible respiratory or cardiac failure with a high-risk of death that is refractory to conventional management
Absolute contraindications
- Progressive non-recoverable cardiac disease (not transplant candidate)
- Progressive non-recoverable respiratory disease (irrespective of transplant status)
- Chronic severe pulmonary hypertension
- Advanced malignancy
- GVHD
- >120kg
- Unwitnessed cardiac arrest
Relative contraindications
- Age > 75
- Multitrauma
- CPR > 60 min
- Multiorgan failure
- CNS injury
VV-EMCO
- Most common method utilised
- Support for severe respiratory failure only
- Oxygenated blood is returned to the right side of heart so can lose oxygen at lungs if FiO2 is low
- Conditions to consider
- ARDS of any cause
- Status asthmaticus
VA-EMCO
- Support for cardiac failure +- respiratory failure
- Conditions
- Failed heart or heart/lung transplant
- Non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock
- Bridge to LVAD
- Bridge to cardiac transplant
- Toxicology
- Sepsis (if significant cardiogenic component)
- PE
- Massive pulmonary haemorrhage
Complications
- Clotting
- Haemolysis
- Suck-down and kicking (vessel collapse around access cannulae)
- Air embolism
- Bleeding
- Pump failure
- Decannulation
- Circuit rupture
- Cardiac arrest
E-CPR
- Rationale
- Provides full circulatory support for reversal of cause i.e. revascularisation
- Evidence shows may improve survival from 0-10% to 10-40% in refractory cardiac arrest over 30 minutes duration
- Asystole as initial rhythm is a strict absolute contraindication
- VF/VT have better outcomes with ECPR
- No flow time = Time from arrest to start of CPR
- Low flow time = Time from start of CPR to commencement of ECMO
- Maximum 45-60 min in most studies but neurologically intact survivors have been seen with times up to 1.5 hours
- Inclusion criteria (RBWH)
- Age <65
- Independent living
- WITNESSED Arrest
- IMMEDIATE Bystander CPR
- First rhythm VF or VT
- DC shocks x 3
- Amiodarone 300mg
- Arrest to ED <45 min
- Exclusion criteria (RBWH)
- Asystole or PEA <40/min as first rhythm
- Arrest to ED >45 min OR
- Age + Arrest time >100
- Not For Resuscitation
- Terminal illness
- Significant chronic organ failure
- Significant haemorrhage
- Exclusion criteria (Alfred)
- Age >65
- Unwitnessed
- Asystole initial rhythm
- No flow time >10 min
- Low flow time >60 min
- Terminal illness
- Known severe neurological injury
- Relative exclusion criteria (Alfred)
- Lactate >18
- pH <6.8
- etCO2 <10
- Minnesota E-CPR Protocol
- If 2 or more below poor prognostic features, patient excluded:
- EtCO2 <10
- PaO2 <50mmHg
- Lactate >18
- If 2 or more below poor prognostic features, patient excluded:
Last Updated on December 4, 2024 by Andrew Crofton
Andrew Crofton
0
Tags :