ACEM Fellowship
COVID-19 Management Evidence

COVID-19 Management Evidence

Steroid therapy

PRINCIPLE Study

  • Adults with COVID treated with inhaled budesonide (800mcg twice daily) for up to 14 days
  • Inclusion criteria for those at risk of progression:
    • Diabetes (not treated with insulin)
    • Heart disease or hypertension
    • Asthma or lung disease
    • Immunosuppression
    • Mild hepatic impairment
    • Stroke or other neurological issue
  • Decreases the requirement of supplemental oxygen if taken within 14 days of onset of symptoms

RECOVERY Study (June 2020)

  • 2104 patients randomised to dexamethasone 6mg daily for 10 days vs. 4321 patients who received usual care
  • Primary outcome: 28 day mortality was significantly reduced in dexamethasone group (21.6 vs. 24.6%)
  • Secondary outcomes:
    • Dexamethasone reduced 28-day mortality in mechanically ventilated patients, patients receiving oxygen; reduced hospital LOS by 1 day and reduced rates of ventilation
  • NNT = 8 for reducing mortality in mechanically ventilated patients
  • NNT= 25 for reducing mortality in patients requiring oxygen
  • Not helpful for patients not requiring mechanical ventilation or oxygen therapy
  • More likely to be helpful if started >7 days from onset of symptoms

REMAP-CAP (2020)

  • Hydrocortisone in severe COVID-19 patients (HFNC >30L and FiO2 >0.4, NIV or invasive ventilation or cardiovascular support
  • 403 enrolled to corticosteroid arm
    • 143 fixed dose (50mg q6h for 7 days)
    • 152 shock dose (50mg q6h whilst in shock up to 28 days) in those with cardiovascular shock
    • 108 no hydrocortisone
  • Primary outcome
    • No significant difference in respiratory and cardiovascular support-free days
    • Did provide high probability of superiority (Bayesian approach) of corticosteroid use in organ support-free days within 21 days
  • Also reported large reduction in progression to invasive ventilation, ECMO or death with the hydrocortisone regimes above

Antivirals

Remdesivir

ACTT-1

  • Tested Remdesivir in hospitalised patients with SARS-Cov-2 compared to placebo
  • Active metabolite of Remdesivir interferes with the action of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase thereby reducing viral RNA production
  • Participants had to require supplemental O2, mechanical ventilation or ECMO
  • 1059 patients studied
  • Primary outcome
    • Significantly shorter time to recovery with Remdesivir: 11 days vs. 15 days
    • No difference in those on MV or ECMO at time of randomisation
  • No significant difference in mortality
  • Odds of improvement in ordinal scale score measured at day 15 were higher in Remdesivir group

Gottlieb et al.

  • Double-blind RCT of 562 patients showed IV remdesivir use within 7 days of symptom onset in non-hospitalised adults with at least one risk factor for disease progression (see below) resulted in an 87% lower rate of hospitalisation or death at 28 days
  • Risk factors for progression
    • >= 60 years
    • Obesity
    • HTN
    • Cardiovascular disease
    • Cerebrovascular disease
    • DM
    • Obesity
    • Immunocompromise
    • Chronic liver disease
    • Chronic lung disease
    • Cancer
    • Sickle cell disease
    • Chronic mild or moderate kidney disease

Molnupiravir

Bernal et al.

  • Oral, small-molecule prodrug active against SARS-COV-2
  • Phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT of 1433 patients within 5 days of symptoms in non-hospitalised unvaccinated patients with at least one risk factor for progression
  • Hospitalisation or death from any cause reduced to 7.3% vs. 14.1%

Immunomodulators

Tocilizumab

BACC trial (December 2020)

  • Studied the benefit of Tocilizumab in hospitalised patients with severe ARDS due to SARS-Cov-2
  • Early trials in Chinese patients showed high circulating levels of IL-6 associated with progression to mechanical ventilation and death
  • Tocilizumab is an IL-6 receptor blocker monoclonal antibody
  • This was a double-blinded randomised control trial of 243 patients across 7 hospitals in Boston, USA
  • Inclusion criteria
    • Age 19-85
    • Confirmed SARS-Cov-2
    • Two of:
      • Fever, pulmonary infiltrate, need for supplemental O2
    • AND one of:
      • CRP >50, ferritin >500ng/mL, D-dimer >1000ng/mL or LDH >250u/L
  • Exclusion criteria
    • Supplemental O2 >10L/min
    • Recent biologic agent or immunosuppressive therapy
    • Diverticulitis
  • Some patients received remdesivir and no patients received hydrocortisone
  • Primary outcome: No significant difference in intubation or death by day 28
  • Conclusion is that in this moderately unwell cohort, Tocilizumab was not beneficial

REMAP-CAP IL-6

  • Included patients in ICU receiving mechanical ventilation, HFNP >30L/min and FiO2 >0.4 or cardiovascular support
  • Compared IL-6 inhibitors with placebo in a Bayesian design with multiple intervention cohorts
  • Could repeat dose of Tocilizumab at 12-24 hours at clinician discretion
  • Primary outcomes
    • Significantly increased number of organ support-free days (OR 1.64)
    • Significantly reduced hospital mortality (OR 1.64)
  • Secondary outcomes
    • Significantly improved 90-day survival, time to ICU discharge and progression to invasive ventilation, ECMO or death
    • No significant difference in adverse effects

Baricitinib

COV-BARRIER

  • Tested Baricitinib (a JAK 1/2 inhibitor) in hospitalised patients with SARS-Cov-2 pneumonia
  • ACTT-2 showed reduction in time to recovery in combination with Remdesivir vs. Remdesivir alone
  • Patients included if hospitalised but NOT mechanically ventilated (and later in study had to require O2 therapy)
  • 12 countries across the world
  • No significant difference in composite endpoint of progression to NIV/HFNP/MV/ECMO/Death by day 28
  • A significant reduction was seen in all cause mortality (NNT = 20 at day 28)
  • Seems to be more beneficial in those who were sicker at baseline (needing O2 supplementation at randomisation)

ACTT-2

  • Baricitinib plus Remdesivir vs. Remdesivir alone in hospitalised patients with COVID-19
  • 1033 patients were randomised
  • Baricitinib group showed signficantly faster recovery (7 days vs. 8 days) and 30% higher odds of improvement in clinical status at day 15
  • Patients on HFNP or NIV at randomisation had a time to recovery of 10 days vs. 15 days in control group
  • 28 day mortality was 5.1% in combination cohort vs. 7.8% in control group

Carsirivimab and Imdevimab (REGEN-COV)

RECOVERY REGEN-COV

  • Addition of carsirivimab and imdevimab monoclonal antibodies (REGEN-COV) to standard care
  • These are non-competitive monoclonal antibodies that bind to the receptor binding domain of the spike glycoprotein on SARS-Cov-2, blocking viral entry into host cells
  • Two antibodies were used that bind to non-overlapping epitopes to minimise the risk of resistance
  • 127 UK hospitals involved
  • Primary outcome of 28 day mortality was significantly reduced in REGEN-COV group (24 vs. 30%; NNT 19) in the seronegative at baseline cohort
    • No significant difference if patients seropositive at baseline were included
  • In seronegative patients
    • Significantly reduced progression to NIV or MV
    • No significant difference in progression to MV alone
    • Significantly greater proportion discharged alive from hospital within 28 days
  • Benefits lost in seropositive patients at baseline

Sotrovimab

COMET-ICE

  • Sotrovimab use in non-vaccinated adults not requiring oxygen with risk factors for progression:
    • Diabetes
    • Obesity
    • CKD
    • NYHA II or higher
    • COAD
    • Moderate to severe asthma
    • Age >=55
  • Decreased the risk of hospitalisation if taken within 5 days of onset

Sarilumab

  • Patients that require high-flow oxygen, non-invasive ventilation or invasive ventilation have a reduced risk of death
  • REMAP-CAP
  • Lescure et al. Lancet Resp medicine
  • Sivapalasingam et al. medRxiv 2021

Convalescent Plasma

PlasmAr

  • In patients with severe pneumonia due to SARS-Cov-2 no benefit shown with respect to mortality or other clinical outcomes at day 30

NIV

Recovery-RS

  • Compared NIV, HFNP or conventional oxygen therapy in reducing progression to intubation or death in hospitalised patients with pneumonia from SARS-Cov-2
  • 1277 patients randomised to CPAP vs. HFNP vs. COT
  • Mean 9.5cmH20 CPAP, 50L/min HFNP
  • Progression to intubation was at discretion of treating clinicians
  • Primary outcome
    • Combined endpoint of intubation or death within 30 days was significantly reduced in CPAP group (NNT = 12) but not in HFNP group
  • Secondary outcomes
    • ICU admission significantly less likely in CPAP group
    • Time to intubation longer in CPAP group (2.2 days vs. 1.0 days)
    • NO significant difference in duration of MV, ICU LOS or hospital LOS
    • Haemodynamic instability far more common in CPAP group

Chemoprophylaxis

REGEN-COV (O’Brien et al. NEJM 2021)

  • Prophylactic casirivimab plus imdevimab reduces risk of symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19 infection in seronegative household contacts if provided within 4 days of exposure
  • If serology not immediately available, can provide to those that are PCR-negative and considered unlikely to have had COVID before
  • 600mg of each SC in trial
  • Vaccinated individuals were excluded from this trial and it is not known if chemoprophylaxis is beneficial (or harmful) in this cohort
  • This trial was performed prior to the Delta outbreak

No evidence for hydroxychloroquine

Proning

PRON-COVID

  • Prone positioning previously shown to improve oxygenation and mortality in non-COVID ARDS
  • Single-centre, prospective feasibility study in Italy of patients requiring supplemental oxygen or NIV
  • Patients were encouraged to maintain prone positioning for at least 3 hours
  • Patients could maintain prone positioning for up to 8 hours if desired
  • Primary outcome of P/F ratio before and 1hr after proning
  • 57 patients total enrolled
  • Prone positioning was feasible (maintained for at least 3 hours) in 84% of patients

PROFLO

  • Multicentre randomised trial comparing prone positioning targeting 16 hours per day or standard care
  • Primary endpoint was intubation within 30 days
  • 75 patients randomised
  • Median hours prone per day was 3.4 in control group vs. 9 in prone group
  • No change in rate of intubation within 30 days

Erhmann et al. Lancet Resp Med

  • Meta-trial of 6 randomised trials of prone positioning for patients on HFNP
  • Hazard ratio for intubation was 0.75 for prone positioning within 28 days of enrolment
  • Rates of adverse events was low and similar between each group

Last Updated on December 29, 2021 by Andrew Crofton