Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Introduction

  • Syndrome NOT disease
  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    • First described 1967 (Ashbaugh  et al.)
    • Stated ‘illness closely resembled the infantile respiratory distress syndrome’
  • Incidence
    • Variable
    • 1.5 per 100 000 (Rubenfeld) to 79 per 100 000 (Villar)
    • Up to 10 fold higher incidence in US vs. Europe

Definitions


AECCBerlinKigali modification
TimingAcute onsetWithin 1 week of known clinical insult or new or worsening resp symptomsWithin 1 week of known clinical insult or new or worsening resp symptoms
OxygenationP/F ≤ 200 (ALI if ≤ 300)Mild: P/F 200-300 Moderate: P/F 100-200 Severe: P/F ≤100SpO2/FiO2 ≤315
PEEPNoneMinimum 5 for invasive MV (Non-invasive acceptable for mildNone
Chest imagingBilateral infiltrates on frontal CXRBilateral opacities not fully explained by effusions/collapse or nodules on CXR or CTBilateral opacities not fully explained by effusions/collapse or nodules on CXR or USS
Origin of oedemaPAWP <18 or no evidence of LA hypertensionResp failure not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload (need objective assessment if no risk factors present)Resp failure not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload (need objective assessment if no risk factors present)

Pathology

CXR in ARDS

  • Diffuse bilateral coalescent opacification
  • Typically CXR features arise within 12-24 hours secondary to proteinaceous interstitial oedema

Diffuse alveolar damage

  • Pathological hallmark of ARDS
  • Only seen in 50% of cases
  • Hyperaemia, alveolar atelectasis, interstitial and intra-alveolar haemorrhage/oedema, numerous alveolar macrophages and hyaline membranes
  • Subsequent alveolar microvascular permeability and surfactant inactivation
  • May be ventilator associated
  • Associated with higher mortality if found on open lung biopsy

LUNG SAFE TRIAL (Bellani et al.)

  • Algorithmic diagnosis using Berlin criteria vs. Clinical
  • 34% diagnosed Day 1 and 60% by end of ICU stay
  • Secondary endpoints
    • 83% received PEEP <12
    • 35% Vt >8mL/kg without Pplat measurement
  • Conclusions
    • ARDS under-recognised and under-treated
  • Problems
    • 17% of patients with ‘ARDS’ didn’t have it 24 hours later
    • Measured prevalence from ICU population only (not general population)
    • If no patients in 4 week period, ICU excluded from analysis (falsely high prevalence)
    • Seasonal peak so not true prevalence

Mortality (Ranieri et al.)

ARDS Severity  PaO2/FiO2*  Mortality** 
Mild200 – 30027%
Moderate100 – 20032%
Severe< 10045%

Risk factors for ARDS (Rubenfeld et al.)

  • Severe sepsis with suspected pulmonary source (46%)
  • Severe sepsis with suspected non-pulmonary source (33%)
  • Witnessed aspiration (11%)
  • Severe trauma (7%)
  • Blood transfusion (3%)
  • Drug overdose (3%)
  • Pancreatitis (3%)
  • Other (14%)
    • Pulmonary contusion, severe burns, non-cardiogenic shock, pulmonary vasculitis and drowning

Diagnostic workup (Papazian et al.)

PathogensSpecies
BacteriaS. Pneumoniae H. Influenzae Enterobacteriaceae S. Aureus Legionella pneumophila Chalmydia pneumoniae Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pseudomonas aeruginosa Acinetobacter baumanii Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
VirusesInfluenza A and B Rhinovirus RSV Parainfluenza Metapneumovirus Coronavirus Enterovirus Adenovirus HSV CMV
FungiPneumocystis jirovecii Aspergillus fumigatus
ParasitesToxoplasma gondii
  • Blood culture
  • Urinary antigen testing
    • Legionella pneumophila type 1
    • S. pneumoniae
  • Atypical serology
    • Chlamydia, Mycoplasma, Legionella longbeachie/pneumophila
  • Respiratory viral PCR
  • Fibreoptic BAL
    • Gram-stain
    • Giemsa-stain
      • Better visualisation of host cell morphology e.g. viral inclusions, improved detection of bacteria, especially intracellular bacteria and detection of some protozoa/fungi
    • Culture and PCR for respiratory viruses, Pneumocystis and Aspergillus 
    • Specific staining for Legionella, Pneumocystis and Toxoplasma gondii
  • If no clinical risk factors for ARDS:
    • BAL fluid cytology
    • CT chest
    • Specific immunological examinations
    • Consider malignancy: Adenocarcinoma, lymphangitis
    • Consider open lung biopsy

Treatment

  • Treat underlying aetiology + supportive cares
  • Supplemental oxygen
  • Non-invasive ventilation
  • Intubation and ventilation with lung protective strategy
  • Recruitment manoeuvres
  • Prone
  • Pulmonary vasodilators
  • Surfactant
  • Oscillation
  • ECMO

Non-invasive ventilation

  • No benefit of CPAP O2 vs. O2 (Delclaux et al.)
  • BiPAP may reduce mortality and intubation rates (Ferrer et al.)
    • Tested acute type 1 respiratory failure
    • No benefit in ARDS sub-group but not designed for this
  • BiPAP may be useful as first-line intervention in type 1 respiratory failure including mild ARDS (Thille et al.)
    • Probably not helpful and possibly harmful in moderate/severe ARDS

Lung Protective Strategy
(ARDS-Network)

  • Traditional: Vt 10-15mL/kg with control of arterial pH and PaCO2 taking precedence over lung protection
  • Study aimed to ascertain if lower tidal volumes with permissive hypercapnoea/acidosis would improve clinical outcomes
  • 861 patients, 10 ICU’s, intubated and MV with acute P/F ratio <300, bilateral pulmonary infiltrates and no clinical evidence of LA hypertension or PCWP <18
  • Traditional tidal volume vs. lung protective strategy
  • Outcomes
    • 31% lung protective vs. 39.8% traditional mortality (P=0.005)
  • Initial Vt = 8mL/kg PBW
  • Reduce Vt by 1mL/kg at <2 hr intervals to 6mL/kg PBW
  • Set initial rate to baseline MV (not > 35)
  • Adjust Vt and RR to achieve pH and Pplat goals below
  • Oxygenation goal
    • PaO2 55-80, minimum PEEP 5
    • Can use FiO/PEEP combinations as below
      (not mandatory)
FiO20.30.40.40.50.50.60.70.70.70.80.90.90.91.0
PEEP558810101012141414161818-24
  • Plateau pressure goal <30cm H20
  • Check at least q4h and after each change in PEEP or Vt
  • If Pplat >30: Decrease Vt by 1mL/kg (min 4mL/kg)
  • If Pplat <25 and Vt <6mL/kg increase Vt by 1mL/kg until Pplat >25 or Vt = 6mL/kg
  • If Pplat <30 and breath-stacking or dys-synchrony: May increase Vt in 1mL/kg increments to 7-8mL/kg if Pplat remains <30
  • pH Goal 7.30-7.45
    • If pH 7.15-7.30: Increase RR up to max 35 until pH >7.30 or PCO2 <25
    • If pH <7.15: Increase RR to 35. If pH remains <7.15, Vt can be increased by 1mL/kg steps. Can exceed Pplat >30 if necessary. Can consider HCO3
    • If pH > 7.45: Decrease RR if possible
  • I:E ratio goal
    • Aim duration of inspiration <= duration of expiration (i.e. 1: >1)

Open lung ventilation strategy

  • Involves increased PEEP in setting of lung protective tidal volumes
  • No universal protocol
  • May incorporate recruitment manoeuvres
  • Potential benefits to increased PEEP
    • Maximal recruitment of alveoli 
    • Minimises cyclic atelectasis and shear trauma
    • Minimises de-nitrogenation atelectasis and oxygen toxicity (by allowing lower FiO2)
    • Reduces inflammatory mediator release from alveolar collapse

Optimal PEEP

  • Balance between regional over-stretch and regional de-recruitment
  • May change over time
  • Methods
    • Adjust according to FiO2 (as per ARDSnet)
    • Staircase recruitment manoeuvres
    • Higher than the upper or lower inflection point on pressure-volume curve
    • Adjust to maximise static compliance (Tv/Pplat-PEEP)
    • Lowest intra-pulmonary shunt (highest mixed venous O2 saturation in pulmonary artery)

Optimal target PaO2

LOCO2 (Barrot et al.) was a prospective, multi-centre RCT in France with patients randomised to either conservative oxygenation (target PaO2 55-70mmHg) or liberal oxygenation (target PaO2 90-105mmHg)

Total of 205 patients randomised, with no statistical difference in primary outcome of death from any cause at day 28.

There was, however, a statistically significant trend towards higher mortality at 90 days in conservative group vs. liberal group (44.4% vs. 30.4%)

The trial was terminated early after 5 episodes of mesenteric ischaemia in the conservative group occurred.

Evidence for open lung strategy

  • ALVEOLI (2004) – No difference in mortality between high and low PEEP with lung protective strategy
  • LOVS (2008) – Improved oxygenation and less rescue intervention (i.e. ECMO) but no difference in mortality
  • EXPRESS (2008) – More ventilator-free days, more organ-failure free days but no difference in mortality
  • Briel (2010) –Meta-analysis of above 3 showed higher PEEP improved mortality among ARDS but not ALI patients

Pressure-volume (compliance) curves 

FiO20.30.40.40.50.50.60.70.70.70.80.90.90.91.0
PEEP558810101012141414161818-24

P-V curves in ARDS

  • Appears sigmoidal between FRC and TLC
    • Normally linear and concave down at higher lung volumes between FRC and TLC in healthy subjects
  • Lower volume excursion to TLC
  • Entire curve shifted down on absolute volume axis
  • Static compliance
    • Vt/(Ppeak – PEEP) (i.e. ΔP/ Δ V)
    • Assumes linear relationship when true curve sigmoidal
    • If increase PEEP, improved static compliance may just be movement up pressure-volume curve
  • Quasi-static PV curves
    • Multiple methods but essentially measure multiple P-V points with tidal breaths in between along both inspiratory and expiratory limbs to generate curve
    • Reflects balance of chest wall and lung parenchymal forces
    • Lung volume where outward chest expansion balances inward retraction of lung parenchyma = FRC
    • Chest wall contributes to most curvature below FRC; lung contributes most to curvature above FRC

Hysteresis

  • Increased compliance on descending limb of P-V curve vs. inspiratory limb
  • Minimal with small volume changes but increases as volume excursion increases
  • Mainly determined by air-liquid surface interactions within alveoli
  • Results from 4 processes:
    • Recruitment/derecruitment
    • Surfactant
    • Stress relaxation of lung i.e. previously collapsed or fully inflated prior to measurements
    • Gas absorption during measurements of P-V curves

Recruitment manoeuvres

  • Involves transient elevation in airway pressure applied during mechanical ventilation to ‘recruit’ lung units and increase number of alveoli involved in gas exchange
  • Cochrane review (Hodgson et al.)
    • 10 trials (1658 patients) involved. Heterogenous study group and many co-interventions that could lead to bias
    • Reduced ICU mortality (RR 0.83, P=0.02)
    • No difference in 28 day mortality
    • No difference in in-hospital mortality
    • No difference in risk of barotrauma
  • Methods
    • 40cmH20 for 40-60 seconds
    • 3 consecutive sighs/min with Pplat of 45cmH20
    • 2 min peak pressure of 50cmH20 and PEEP above upper inflection point
    • RAMP: Low slow increase in insp pressure up to 40cmH20
    • Stepped increase in pressure (e.g. Staircare Recruitment Manoeuvre)
  • Disadvantages
    • May require heavy sedation/paralysis
    • Transient benefits at times
    • Haemodynamic instability (reduced preload)
    • Hypercapnoea
    • May worsen VQ matching
    • Overdistension and repeated opening of lung leading to ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI)
    • Risk of pneumothorax

Steroids

  • Early high-dose methylprednisolone no benefit on mortality (Bernard et al.)
  • Prolonged low-dose methylprednisolone in prolonged ARDS (>7 days) no benefit on mortality (Steinberg et al.)
    • Significantly increased mortality if initiated 2 weeks or more after onset
  • Early (before day 14) and prolonged (>7 days) glucocorticoids accelerate resolution and decrease hospital mortality (Meduri et al.)
  • Unclear which steroid (hydrocortisone or methylprednisolone) or what level of dosing provides benefit

Neuromuscular blockade
(Papazian et al.)

  • Hypothesised to assist open lung ventilation strategy
  • In moderate-severe ARDS, Cisatracurium infusion vs. placebo significantly improved mortality once adjusted for baseline P/F ratio, plateau pressure and SAP II score

Prone positioning

  • Potential benefits (Pelosi/Gattinoni/Pappert/Gillart)
    • Prone positioning optimises both lung recruitment and VQ matching
    • Collapse due to gravity of ventral lung segments in prone is less than that of dorsal segments in supine position, while lung perfusion in prone is more evenly distributed
    • Enhanced postural drainage of secretions
  • Meta-analysis (Sud et al.) showed prone positioning >14 hours per day for median 4.7 days improved mortality in subgroup with P/F ratio <140
    • Reduced VAP
    • Risks of pressure ulcers, ET obstruction and dislodgements
  • RCT of only P/F ratio <150 (Guerin et al. PROSEVA) showed at least 16 hrs continuous proning per day showed significantly reduced mortality (16% vs. 32%)

Nitric oxide

  • Inhaled nitric oxide is selective pulmonary vasodilator with minimal systemic effects
  • Taylor et al. 
    • No significant effect on mortality in moderate-severe ARDS but induced rapid improvement in oxygen lasting 24 hours

Prostacyclin

  • No study performed with primary mortality outcomes
  • Shown to improve PaO2 and reduce PAP as well as inhaled NO (Van heerden et al.; Walmrath et al.; Zwissler et al.)
  • Cochrane study found insufficient evidence to support or refute its use
  • IV prostacyclin
    • Systemic vasodilation leading to reduced systemic arterial pressure
    • Non-selective pulmonary vasodilation with reversal of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction leading to perfused of non-ventilated alveoli

Surfactant

  • Paediatric studies have shown improved oxygenation, reduced duration of ventilation and improved survival in:
    • Preterm infants with surfactant deficiency
    • Term infants with pneumonia and meconium aspiration [Auten/Findlay/Khammash/Lotze]
  • 5 RCT’s of exogenous surfactant use in adult ARDS failed to demonstrate sustained benefit

High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV)

  • Lungs held inflated to maintain oxygenation
  • CO2 cleared by small volumes of gas moved in and out of lungs at 3-15Hz
  • Theoretically minimises shear forces and opening/closing trauma
  • OSCAR trial (Young et al. 2013)
    • No significant difference in mortality at 1 month in moderate-severe ARDS
  • OSCILLATE (Ferguson et al. 2013)
    • Study terminated early due to markedly higher mortality in HFOV group (47% vs. 35%)

ECMO

  • Rationale for use
    • Rescue therapy for severe refractory hypoxaemia, hypercapnoea or both 
      • Typically venovenous ECMO or venoarterial if significant cardiac dysfunction
    • To replace/reduce mechanical ventilation and reduce harmful effects of ventilator-induced lung injury
      • Venovenous ECMO or ECCO2R (studies ongoing)
  • H1N1 Pandemic (Davies et al.)
    • 68 patients received ECMO in Aus/NZ
    • 78% survival rate vs. 52-70% in previous studies without ECMO support
  • CESAR
    • 2009 UK prospective RCT
    • Severe respiratory failure taken to central site and treated with ECMO vs. conventional ventilation
    • 90 patients in each group from 68 centres
    • Significant improvement in mortality (37% vs. 53%)
    • Issues
      • Not all patients assigned to ECMO received it (some died on the way or improved enough to not need it)
      • Only a few of conventional group received protective ventilation strategy

ECCO2R

  • SUPERNOVA and REST studies ongoing
    • Ultraprotective strategy with extracorporeal low-flow CO2 removal
    • Ongoing multicentre pilot study of lower Vt at 4mL/kg facilitated by ECCO2R

Prevention

  • Aspirin (Kor et al.)
    • Aspirin vs. placebo in patients at risk of ARDS showed no statistical difference in incidence of ARDS or mortality
  • Statins (Xiong et al.)
    • Statin vs. placebo meta-analysis of patients at risk of diagosed with ALI/ARDS showing no significant difference in incidence of ARDS or mortality

References

  • Ashbaugh DG, Bigelow DB, Petty TL, et al. Acute respiratory distress in adults. Lancet 1967; 2: 319–323.
  • Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA 2012; 307: 2526–2533.
  • Rubenfeld GD, Caldwell E, Peabody E, et al. Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2005;353: 1685–1693.
  • Villar J, Blanco J, Añón JM, et al. The ALIEN study: incidence and outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome in the era of lung protective ventilation. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37: 1932–1941.
  • Riviello ED, Kiviri W, Twagirumugabe T, et al. Hospital incidence and outcomes of the acute respiratory distress syndrome using the Kigali modification of the Berlin Definition. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 193: 52–59.
  • Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, et al. Comparison of the SpO2/FIO2 ratio and the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS. Chest 2007; 132: 410–417.
  • Lichtenstein D, Goldstein I, Mourgeon E, et al. Comparative diagnostic performances of auscultation, chest radiography, and lung ultrasonography in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology 2004; 100: 9–15.
  • Thompson BT; Guérin C; Esteban A, Intensive Care Medicine [Intensive Care Med], ISSN: 1432-1238, 2016 May; Vol. 42 (5), pp. 653-5
  • Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, et al. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA 2016; 315: 788–800.
  • Gajic O, Dabbagh O, Park PK, et al. Early identification of patients at risk of acute lung injury: evaluation of lung injury prediction score in a multicenter cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 183: 462–470.
  • Xiong B, Wang C, Tang J, et al. Statins for the prevention and treatment of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respirology 2016; 21: 1026–1033.
  • Patel BK, Wolfe KS, Pohlman AS, et al. Effect of noninvasive ventilation delivered by helmet vs face mask on the rate of endotracheal intubation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016; 315: 2435–2441.
  • Thille AW, Contou D, Fragnoli C, et al. Non-invasive ventilation for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: intubation rate and risk factors. Crit Care 2013; 17: R269.
  • Lightowler JV, Wedzicha JA, Elliott MW, Ram FS: Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation to treat respiratory failure resulting from exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2003, 326:185.
  • Masip J, Roque M, Sanchez B, Fernandez R, Subirana M, Exposito JA: Noninvasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: systematic review and metaanalysis. JAMA 2005, 294:3124–3130.
  • Delclaux C, L’Her E, Alberti C, Mancebo J, Abroug F, Conti G, Guerin C, Schortgen F, Lefort Y, Antonelli M, et al: Treatment of acute hypoxemic nonhypercapnic respiratory insufficiency with continuous positive airway pressure delivered by a face mask: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2000, 284:2352–2360.
  • Ferrer M, Esquinas A, Leon M, Gonzalez G, Alarcon A, Torres A: Noninvasive ventilation in severe hypoxemic respiratory failure: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003, 168:1438–1444.
  • ARDS Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. NEJM. 2000; 342 (18): 1301-1308.
  • Brower RG, Lanken PN, MacIntyre N, Matthay MA, Morris A, Ancukiewicz M, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute ARDS Clinical Trials Network. Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 22;351(4):327-36
  • Meade MO, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Slutsky AS, Arabi YM, Cooper DJ, Davies AR, Hand LE, Zhou Q, Thabane L, Austin P, Lapinsky S, Baxter A, Russell J, Skrobik Y, Ronco JJ, Stewart TE; Lung Open Ventilation Study Investigators. Ventilation strategy using low tidal volumes, recruitment maneuvers, and high positive end-expiratory pressure for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008 Feb 13;299(6):637-45
  • Mercat A, Richard JC, Vielle B, Jaber S, Osman D, Diehl JL, Lefrant JY, Prat G, Richecoeur J, Nieszkowska A, Gervais C, Baudot J, Bouadma L, Brochard L; Expiratory Pressure (Express) Study Group. Positive end-expiratory pressure setting in adults with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008 Feb 13;299(6):646-55
  • Briel M, Meade M, Mercat A, Brower RG, Talmor D, Walter SD, Slutsky AS, Pullenayegum E, Zhou Q, Cook D, Brochard L, Richard JC, Lamontagne F, Bhatnagar N, Stewart TE, Guyatt G. Higher vs lower positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2010 Mar 3;303(9):865-73
  • Hodgson C, Goligher E, Young M, Keating J, Holland A, Romero L, Bradley S, Tuxen D. Recruitment manoeuvres for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome receiving mechanical ventilation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016.
  • Bernard GR, Luce JM, Sprung CL, Rinaldo JE, Tate RM, Sibbald WJ, Kariman K, Higgins S, Bradley R, Metz CA. High-dose corticosteroids in patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome. N Eng J Med. 1987 Dec 17;317(25): 1565-70.
  • ARDS Network. Efficacy and Safety of Corticosteroids for Persistent Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N Eng J Med 2006; 354: 1671-1684.
  • Meduri G, Marik P, Chrousos G, Pastores S, Arlt W, Beishuizen A, et al. Steroid treatment in ARDS: a critical appraisal of the ARDS network trial and the recent literature. Intensive Care Med 2007
  • Papazian L; Forel JM; Gacouin A; Penot-Ragon C; Perrin G; Loundou A; Jaber S; Arnal JM; Perez D; Seghboyan JM; Constantin JM; Courant P; Lefrant JY; Guérin C; Prat G; Morange S; Roch A; ACURASYS Study Investigators, The New England Journal Of Medicine [N Engl J Med], ISSN: 1533-4406, 2010 Sep 16; Vol. 363 (12), pp. 1107-16
  • Pelosi P, Brazzi L, Gattinoni L (2002) Prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Eur Respir J 20:1017–1028
  • Gattinoni L, Pesenti A, Baglioni S, Vitale G, Rivolta M, Pelosi P (1988) Inflammatory pulmonary edema and positive end-expiratory pressure: correlations between imaging and physiologic studies. J Thorac Imaging 3:59–64
  • Gattinoni L, Pelosi P, Vitale G, Pesenti A, D’Andrea L, Mascheroni D (1991) Body position changes redistribute lung computed-tomographic density in patients with acute respiratory failure. Anesthesiology 74:15–23
  • Pappert D, Rossaint R, Slama K, Gruning T, Falke KJ (1994) Influence of positioning on ventilation–perfusion relationships in severe adult respiratory distress syndrome. Chest 106:1511– 1516
  • Gillart T, Bazin JE, Guelon D, Constantin JM, Mansoor O, Conio N, Schoeffler P (2000) Effect of bronchial drainage on the improvement in gas exchange observed in ventral decubitus in ARDS (French). Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 19:156–163
  • Sud S, et al. Prone ventilation reduces mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure and severe hypoxemia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Apr;36(4):585-99
  • Guérin et al. Prone Positioning in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PROSEVA). New Engl J Med 2013
  • Taylor, R.W. et al (2004) “Low-dose inhaled nitric oxide in patients with acute lung injury: a randomized controlled trial” JAMA 291:1603-1609
  • Young D, et al; OSCAR Study Group. High-frequency oscillation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 28;368(9):806-13
  • Ferguson ND, et al; the OSCILLATE Trial Investigators and the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. High-Frequency Oscillation in Early Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 22
  • National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network. (2006) “Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury” N Engl J Med 354:2564-2575
  • CESAR
  • Davies A, Jones D, Bailey M, Beca J, Bellomo R, Blackwell N, Forrest P, Gattas D, Granger E, Herkes R, et al.; Australia and New Zealand Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ANZ ECMO) Influenza Investigators. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 2009 influenza A(H1N1) acute respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA 2009; 302:1888–1895.
  • Van Heerden PV, Blythe D, Webb SA. Inhaled aerosolized prostacyclin and nitric oxide as selective pulmonary vasodilators in ARDS: a pilot study. Anaesth Intensive Care 1996;24(5):564-568.
  • Walmrath D, Schneider T, Schermuly R, Olschewski H, Grimminger F, Seeger W. Direct comparison of inhaled nitric oxide and aerosolized prostacyclin in acute respiratory distress syndrome.AmJ
  • Respir Crit Care Med 1996;153(3):991-996.
  • Zwissler B, Kemming G, Habler O, Kleen M, Merkel M, Haller M, et al. Inhaled prostacyclin (PGI2) versus inhaled nitric oxide in adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
  • 1996;154(6 Pt 1):1671-1677.
  • TJ Gregory, KP Steinberg, R Spragg, et al. Bovine surfactant therapy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 155 (4) (1997), pp. 1309–1315
  • J Kesecioglu, R Beale, TE Stewart, et al. Exogenous natural surfactant for treatment of acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 180 (10) (2009), pp. 989–994
  • RG Spragg, JF Lewis, H-D Walmrath, et al. Effect of recombinant surfactant protein C-based surfactant on the acute respiratory distress syndrome N Engl J Med, 351 (9) (2004), pp. 884–892
  • RG Spragg, FJH Taut, JF Lewis, et al. Recombinant surfactant protein C-based surfactant for patients with severe direct lung injury Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 183 (8) (2011), pp. 1055–1061
  • RL Auten, RH Notter, JW Kendig, JM Davis, DL Shapiro Surfactant treatment of full-term newborns with respiratory failure. Pediatrics, 87 (1) (1991), pp. 101–107
  • RD Findlay, HW Taeusch, FJ Walther Surfactant replacement therapy for meconium aspiration syndrome. Pediatrics, 97 (1) (1996), pp. 48–52
  • H Khammash, M Perlman, J Wojtulewicz, M Dunn. Surfactant therapy in full-term neonates with severe respiratory failure. Pediatrics, 92 (1) (1993), pp. 135–139
  • A Lotze, GR Knight, GR Martin, et al. Improved pulmonary outcome after exogenous surfactant therapy for respiratory failure in term infants requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Pediatr, 122 (2) (1993), pp. 261–268
  • A Lotze, BR Mitchell, DI Bulas, EM Zola, RA Shalwitz, JH Gunkel, Survanta in Term Infants Study Group Multicenter study of surfactant (beractant) use in the treatment of term infants with severe respiratory failure. J Pediatr, 132 (1) (1998), pp. 40–47

Last Updated on December 29, 2021 by Andrew Crofton